The goal of the conference is to investigate the intricate relationships between argument and value. Given an understanding of argument as articulated reason and a broad conception of values, stretching from individual preferences to deep moral principles and convictions, are these two friends or foes? There is a long tradition of arguing from values, arguing about values and arguing for values: from Perelman’s articulation of the theory of argumentation as “the logic of value judgments” to on-going work in practical philosophy, meta-ethics, applied ethics and value theory in general. The chief problem today is, however, what role argumentation can play in a situation of value pluralism, value conflicts, even deep disagreements. This problem permeates both practical and theoretical reason, given the feeble fact-value distinction. While we have been recommended to respond by resorting to sound argumentation directed to rational “universal audience” (Perelman, Tindale), the reality of the public discourse today seems dominated by appeals to propaganda in order to convert the divided public to one “authoritarian value-system” (Stanley). Is there any way to challenge the simple but ever-stronger uses of arguments supporting that value-system? In any case, we need to re-examine the values in and of argumentation.
These questions, we believe, run deeper than simple semantic ambiguities of the concepts of argument and value. They concern key issues regarding the force of the better argument in the public sphere, the power of values to govern our theoretical and practical reason, and the possible compatibilities and incompatibilities between the two concepts. Accordingly, the focus of the conference is theoretical but not without some practical importance. While the investigation of values and arguments continues among different branches of philosophy – as well as humanities and social sciences in general – the “post-truth society” of today challenges many of the recognised truths. Our aim is to deepen this important current debate.
The Conference is open for attendance without presentation. Register here please.
(See Call for Papers - closed!)
Jason Stanley (Yale University, USA)
Mass communication works by focusing the audience's attention upon certain cherished values, for example equality, social justice, law and order, security, Christianity, European identity, or national pride. Demagogues seek to shift the focus of attention to values that can be strategically manipulated, such as "traditional values". In this talk, I will set out how demagogic speech changes the conversation by shifting mass focus of attention to certain values. For example, by switching attention to values of "law and order", and connecting immigrants to crime, demagogues can gather support by appealing to racist ideologies, or by switching attention to "traditional values", demagogues can gather support by appealing to homophobia, misogyny, or religious prejudice. I will describe how switching the frame of values can alter the discussion space by excluding legitimate policy options. In the final part of the talk I will address how we can respond to these strategic shifts in value. Focusing on concrete struggles for social justice in Switzerland and the United States, I will attempt to answer the question: what methods exist to return the space of public reason to one in which policy options obscured by demagogic tactics are once again in view?
Christopher Tindale (University of Windsor, Canada)
Some views are so extreme they focus the attention of entire societies, consume public debates, and monopolize the energy of a generation. And yet many of those views that “may disrupt the whole course of civilization,” do so successfully and move from the extreme to the accepted. Canadian suffragist Nellie McClung, from whom I take my title, held such a view. She argued the radical position that women should be entitled to vote. She is an interesting example of argumentation that transforms what is reasonable, and how this can be accomplished. In fact, such examples point to a number of important ways argumentation operates: to modify the cognitive environments in which we live; to promote an appreciation of diversity and an understanding of alternative positions; to provide standards of reason by which we measure ourselves relative to our goals and the goals of others.
In this talk, I explore some of the strategies involved in addressing extremism and transforming the values at the heart of extremist discourse to make it more accessible, and even acceptable, and, in some instances, melding it with the status quo. Through some conceptual analysis and the discussion of several case studies, including that of McClung in Canada and the civil rights movement in the US, I will consider how some views are modified over time through the production of argumentation directed at society rather than individuals.
Download here
Download the Book of Abstracts here
The conference takes place at the FCSH campus on avenida de Berna 26, ID building, 4th floor, room Multiusos 3.
Other Practicalities, see here
The conference is a part of the “Values in Argumentative Discourse” project sponsored by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT: PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014), and managed by Erich Rast (PI) at the ArgLab, Nova Institute of Philosophy (IFILNOVA), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
ArgLab Research Colloquium |
ArgLab Research Colloquium |
ArgLab Research Colloquium |
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Pragmatics and argumentation: theoretical and experimental…
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Argumentation as a board game: how…
Schedule - 2nd Semester
ArgLab Research Colloquium | “Fallacies of Meta-Argumentation”
3rd ERB Project Workshop
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Argumentation schemes put to a test:…
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Emerging from what,…
António Marques, 'Between Facts and Norms'
Giovanni Damele, 'Has liberalism ruined everything?'
Luís Miguel Simões, "Political Liberalism"
Marta Vences, 'Empathy and Moral Judgement'
2020/2021
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | The Untold Story…
Zoom Workshop
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Why the Situated…
Enroll now!
With Philip Cole
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Transparency in Extended…
CultureLab | Art of Living
ERB Masterclass 2020
Tiago Sousa, "Designs À La Grecque"
Book launch with Prof. António de Castro Caeiro
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | A situated approach…
ArgLab Research Colloquium
L. Miguel Simões, "Political Treatise"
CultureLab | Art of Living
Lisbon Nietzsche Group Seminar + 2nd Semester Opening Lesson with…
Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image welcomes submissions…
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | The Structure of…
CultureLab | Lisbon Nietzsche Group
CultureLab | Art of Living
Sílvia Bento, "Freedom as the 'Keystone' to the Vault of…
ArgLab Conference
Ana Falcato, "Shame and Autonomy"
THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE DISCURSIVE MANAGEMENT OF POLITICAL DISAGREEMENT
Seminário Rial
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Interpersonal communication and…
CultureLab | Art of Living & Lisbon Nietzsche Group
ArgLab Research Colloquium | Conceptual Engineering: Under our Control?
Art of Living International Workshop /2
Martín Fleitas, "Kant's Conception of Inner Value"
Martín Fleitas, "Notes for a normative-constitutivist approach to the problem…
Diana Neiva apresenta “O cinema e as experiências mentais filosóficas”
An international workshop
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Discursive depoliticisation: From argumentation to explanation"
CultureLab | Art of Living
CultureLab | Art of Living
Colóquio internacional
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Wittgenstein, Buddhism, and…
International Colloquium on the encounter between the work of Werner…
Diogo Nóbrega apresentará Figura. Política e Ontologia. O movimento do…
4th Avant Conference 2019
CultureLab | Art of Living
Inês Salgueiro, "From Hume to Kant via Wittgenstein"
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "More than words: Worldmaking and stancetaking…
CultureLab | Lisbon Nietzsche Group
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
CultureLab
Sofia Miguens - "I, Me, Mine - Back to Kant,…
CultureLab | Art of Living
International Conference on Gratuitous Violence & Free Will in a…
Encontros do grupo de estudo sobre Nietzsche
Jeff McMahan - "Future People, Climate Change, and War"
International Conference THE STATUS OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM
Leituras Contemporâneas. Nietzsche na Espanha
André Silva Santos apresenta Moses und Aron (Straub-Huillet, 1975) e…
António Marques, "Kant against the Animals"
Co-organized by Ifilnova | CineLab - Laboratory of Cinema &…
Co-organized by CineLab - Laboratory of Cinema & Philosophy, EPLab…
Art of Living International Workshop/1
Olivier Chassaing, "The Expressive Function of Punishment"
Nuria Sánchez Madrid, "Linhas de fuga da comunidade estética e…
Nuria Sánchez Madrid, "Oeuvre de l'Art et Oeuvre d'Art"
Per Algander, "Needing and Necessity"
Regina Queiroz, "European Liberalisms: An Essay in Comparative Political Thought"
Culturelab Workshop 3/2019
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Why Immersion is…
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Carlotta Santini, "Nihilism and Mithology The Case of Nietzsche"
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Competing narratives for change"
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Roberto Merrill, "Ethically justifiable? Free riding versus fair shares"
Dina Mendonça, "Kant on the Moral Cultivation of Feelings"
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Sérgio Dias Branco apresenta “Os Lugares da Esperança”
Theory and Practice of global governance: topical issues
Diego Hoefel apresenta "Reinvenções Dramatúrgicas do Melodrama no Cinema Contemporâneo:…
Culturelab Workshop 2/2019
Luís Miguel Simões, "The Double Mouvement in Polanyi and Hayek:…
CultureLab | Ars Vivendi
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Why replication is your problem, too"
Lisbon Mind & Reasoning RIP Seminar | Postponed
Jorge Gonçalves, "A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value"
with Jean-Gabriel Périot and Alain Brossat
with Albert Serra and Alexander Garcia Düttmann
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Aula/Palestra do prof. Ernani Chaves (Univ. Federal do Pará)
Giovanni Damele, "On the Rationality of Democratic Choice"
ArgLab Research Colloquium | "Multidimensional ‘better than’"
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Erich Rast, "How to accept the transitivity of better than"
CultureLab | Arte, Crítica e Experiência Estética
Wagner Teles de Oliveira
Nuno Venturinha's Description of Situations
CultureLab | Questões de Subjectividade: Filosofia e Literatura
CineLab | IFILNOVA - FCSH / PhD Research Project of…
CultureLab | Lisbon Nietzsche Group
CultureLab | Questões de Subjectividade: Filosofia e Literatura
Santoni de Sio
CultureLab | Questões de Subjectividade: Filosofia e Literatura
CultureLab | Questions of Subjectivity: Philosophy & Literature